this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
131 points (99.2% liked)

science

20981 readers
588 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"People more likely to do thing if thing doesn't carry the potential to kill them."

Was this a necessary study?

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oh it is.

There's a lot of cyclist groups I know that oppose separate bike lanes for a plethora of strange reasons.

They are some of the most pro-cycling people I know. But they are blinded by what I call the "pro"-blindness, thinking that because they can effortlessly ride in traffic everyone should do it as well.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It also clarifies that bikes are not cars. There is another strange, probably overlapping, group of cyclists that don’t want that distinction to be made so they can oscillate being vehicular and pedestrian rules at their convenience.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 9 points 2 months ago

When dealing with carbrain bad faith, it could help to have studies to point out the obvious.