this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)
NZ Politics
743 readers
32 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's a nice thought but I am a bit concerned about the ability for the government to kick the opposition MPs out of Parliament, including them not being able to vote.
It's also unprecedented. By confirming this suspension they have just said they think this is 7 times worse than the worst thing that has ever been done by an MP in Parliament since Parliament started.
I know it sucks, but our only recourse is to promote other parties.
Vote the fuckers out! Next year.
I don't condone violent opposition; our democracy still works. I hope we can provide better options for people, and remind them what these useless people have been doing....A year and a half of Seymour as deputy PM is going to be frustrating.
I don't believe what happened is 7 times worse than the next worst thing...5 days would have been enough; to show that this was the worst thing (if you agree it was); it would have given similar weight to the expulsion, without turning it into a parody of itself.
I'd love to know how they came up with the recommendation. Presumably it was not based on history but they are trying to set a new precedent with longer suspensions.
I hope it doesn't become the new normal going forward, like "under urgency" has.
I think it will. It's ratified now, it will be considered in future cases.
I don't really get why we let the government kick out the opposition anyway. At the very least they should still get to vote.
I don't either. Everyone should get to vote. I was reading about the Homosexual law reform the other day and surprised to see some members tried to make Parliament vote early to take advantage of the weather preventing others from attending. That shouldn't be a thing.
That's crazy. Absentee votes should be available for MPs. In the case of the suspended MPs they are not allowed to vote, but do you know if we have ways for MPs to vote if they simply couldn't make it to parliament? With widespread internet access it should be easy to do.
I think you only need one member of your party there these days and they put in a vote for the whole group (section 20.5).
But suspended people can't be included.
Ah nice find. So the weather is now unlikely to affect who can vote.
This part is perhaps relevant:
It seems once the debate is over and they are into voting, no one should talk, and doing so is deemed particularly serious. In this case we have two Te Pāti Māori members making a quite disruptive "interjection" just after Act had voted. The part "since there is no debate in progress, so they can have no justification" would apply in this case, even though perhaps there wasn't an actual party currently voting (as I understand it).
Even though, it doesn't sit right with me that the government can prevent the opposition from voting for a period of time (and especially not the length of time in this case). Surely removing them from the floor (e.g. through suspension) would achieve any goal of restoring order to parliament, and there would be no reason not to let their party vote on their behalf.
This context makes sense, thanks. I can see that interrupting a vote is more serious than ordinary interjections.
I agree though, preventing people (and their constituencies) from voting for weeks seems really anti-democratic.