this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
1085 points (99.3% liked)

Comic Strips

18656 readers
1258 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ideonek@piefed.social 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because of his views.

https://i0.wp.com/50yearoldcomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/gl89-recruit.jpg?ssl=1

https://i0.wp.com/50yearoldcomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/gl89-vapor.jpg?ssl=1

From: https://50yearoldcomics.com/2022/02/19/green-lantern-89-april-1972/

He's consistently an "old lefty" sometimes more "sustainable-first capitalist" sometimes more "anarchist", but his views on things like pollution are well established.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but we're really in "exception proving the rule" territory where you have to reach back to 1972 for an environmental plotline.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Come on, man. You are portraying a scenario when I opened all comics starting now and stopped when I reached a first one with environmental theme? Is this arguing in good faith? The image is old because it's an important part of his worldview for a long time. One of his enemy from this year is named "Fresh Water Killer".

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m not doubting he’s pro-environment, but my original comment referred to characters defined by their environmentalism, and the fact that you’re pushing him so hard as a candidate off something that’s very much a secondary characteristic proves how thin the field is overall.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What his primary characteristic in your mind?

I agree how the filed is overall. He's a very small represnetiarion. But I stand by that he's a valid one.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Put it this way, none of the writers of the Wikipedia article on him have included mentions of environmentalism anywhere close to the opening paragraphs.

Though ironically enough, given what the thread was originally about, the only reference to a environmental activism I can see in there is one where he infiltrates a gang of eco-terrorists to take them down…

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I ment Swamp Thing! Swamp Thing!

Albo, I think Poison Ivey is anti-hero now. So... progress?

Also, Also super heros are by defintion rectionary - it's a whole thing, there is a book about it. So you may hava a point.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

super heros are by defintion rectionary

The other thing that occurs to me is that in most "environmentalist" storylines, the villain's polluting is done illegally, so the hero already represents the status quo.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

That is... a very good point. Not only in the environmental niche, we desperately crave more "it may be legal, but it needs to be stopped" stories. It would actually make more sense narratively. Gave them the actual reason to vigilante.

[–] PlexSheep 1 points 2 months ago

Green arrow has a decent and relatively new series.