this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)
Fuck AI
3805 readers
464 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The person was essentially trying to copyright a prompt.
Devils advocate (i am actually anti intellectual ownership).
How much words is the minimum for legal copyright? Because brand names and poems are.
I believe it might be possible however it wont exactly stop people from using the prompt. Results may be considered inspired rather then derivative.
You might have misunderstood.
The output wouldn’t matter. You are not copyrighting an ai prompt. Your copyrighting a proclaimed poem that just happens to look like a prompt.
And when you hear people use your “poem” as a prompt then you sue on the arguments that they stole your poem to make ai stuff. Flimsy but not beyond reality.
That generative ai will always show slightly different results is by design and decided by the seed and temperatures of the model. With Full control (like local stable diffusion) you can fix those and then the same prompt will always result in the same output.