this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
699 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
4378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Why would they in the first place? It would be like a newspaper buying gold. If investors want to buy bitcoin they can just do that.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If i understood it correctly, meta wants to slap its own crypto-currency on everything.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buying BTC doesn't help them do that.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"our crypto is backed in value by bitcoin"

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
  1. They're selling shares of their company, META stocks, to the shareholders that then vote on their liquidity portfolios. Not selling Crypto. Owners of a hypothetical META crypto don't benefit from or have any say in how the company operates.

  2. Alternatively to BTC they could spend that money on holding their own hypothetical crypto so as to create market cap and buy/sell volumes appealing to crypto investors.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because holding USD is a liability these days.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is it?

Seems like petrodollars have been riding high for decades.

[–] lerba@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

!remindme in one year

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Since you've missed the news, the USA has been overtaken by a fascist christian white supremacist party who gut social programs, cut science funding, literally completely disbanded the department of education, increased the defficit, and enacted large Tariffs on every other nation.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the USA has been overtaken by a fascist christian white supremacist party

For the third time (assuming you don't count Congressional cycles) in twenty years. I've spent a solid 13 of the last 25 years living under a Christian Fascist presidency. Why am I supposed to assume that will devalue the dollar this time around?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

You're either pretending this administration isn't worse than any previous example or you are woefully naïve.