this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
72 points (98.6% liked)

Law

856 readers
26 users here now

Discussion about legal topics, centered around United States

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Veteran lawyers have reached a curious conclusion about Trump's deals with big law firms this year: they do not appear to be legally valid.

Trump since coming to office has punished certain firms for their past clients or causes, stripping them of security clearances and government contracts, while trumpeting deals with others, including titans like Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins.

The White House said the nine firms it's settled with agreed to provide about $1 billion in pro bono services in order to curtail investigations into their hiring practices and maintain access to federal buildings. But the details of those agreements remain murky, even after Democratic lawmakers demanded answers.

"The problem with the law firm deals is … they're not deals at all," said Harold Hongju Koh, a professor and former dean at Yale Law School. "You know, a contract that you make with a gun to your head is not a contract."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Have the Law Firms tried BENDING THE KNEE and doing LITERALLY Whatever Trump wants? That USUALLY works really well!