this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
4 points (61.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

3216 readers
490 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A global military buildup poses an existential threat to climate goals, according to researchers who say the rearmament planned by Nato alone could increase greenhouse gas emissions by almost 200m tonnes a year.

With the world embroiled in the highest number of armed conflicts since the second world war, countries have embarked on military spending sprees, collectively totalling a record $2.46tn in 2023.

For every dollar invested in new hardware, there is not only a corresponding carbon cost but also an opportunity cost to potential climate action, critics say. This is on top of the huge death toll resulting from armed conflicts.

Few militaries are transparent about the scale of their fossil fuel use, but researchers have estimated that collectively they are already responsible for 5.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What good is saving the planet if Russia kills everyone anyway.

[โ€“] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 months ago

What good is saving yourself from Russia if humanity snuffs it anyway?

MAD was supposed to be a threat, not a promise.