this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
396 points (99.3% liked)

2meirl4meirl

1863 readers
113 users here now

Memes that are too meirl for /c/meirl.

Rules:

  1. Respect the community. If you're not into self-deprecating/dark/suicidal humor then this place isn't for you. Kindly just block and move on. This is just how some of us cope.

  2. Respect one another.

  3. All titles must begin with 2meirl4meirl. This is for multiple reasons. One is just so you can be lazy with titles but another is so people who aren't into this kind of humor can avoid it.

  4. Otherwise just the general no bigotry, no dickishness, no spam, no malice, etc stuff.

Sidebar will be updated when I feel like and considering I'm Sadboi extraordinaire we'll see when that will be.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

My home room was next to the debate room and I was always so confused how a club about debating basically boiled down to how fast can you get words out of your mouth. I’m sure I’m simplifying it, but I swear that’s all they did. Just talk really really fast.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Absolutely not mate! Watch a Ben Shapiro debate, he gets his splinter violated almost every debate! Sure, you might scare or stifle> quote the words into an unexperienced debater but thats not really an accomplishment!

Its kind of a trade off actually! You not answering a point might seem as you coinciding, or even agreeing to it: so it might seem brilliant to bring up 3-4 like benny boy does while only really giving the opportunity to answer one, but… you also give them the choice to pick the one they can answer best while personally pushing your own possibly better arguments away!

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That's a specific event called "policy". The other competitive highschool debate events in the US (at least when i competed) are public forum, Lincoln Douglas, and student congress. The super fast speaking was referred to as "spreading", and it only happened in policy debate. Policy was pretty subjectively stupid imo. The year I started debate, the team that won nationals in policy won because their plan only destroyed the world 10x over, where the opponents plan destroyed it 20x over. Not that the other events were any less stupid. Granted that it was a small local tournament and I was against a team of sophomores, but I've successfully won a round of public forum debate by claiming that nuclear energy is good and we should make more primarily because that would increase the spawn rate of mutant ninja turtles thus reducing crime.