this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
228 points (97.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3200 readers
555 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yikes. Evangelizing about tolerance towards a group that itself preaches the value in your wholesale slaughter is... not great. We can at the same time understand that they've been victims of a massive propaganda campaign and revile them for wanting us dead. Wishing for someone to face the consequences of their actions isn't intolerant, it's fair.
You don't get one without the other. Hate is what they feed on. Attention. Anger. Deprive them of that. Any harm done to them hurts their neighbors, their kids, other locals who didn't vote, or voted against it, and it's just.. a bad take. Wishing harm on others is just shit-slinging, and I'm sick of it. Reject the hate in your heart.
You are actually philosophically in the wrong here- you should take a look at the paradox of tolerance.
A tolerant, just person MUST NOT tolerate intolerance.
That's not the same thing. I'm saying, "don't wish harm on people just because they live in a red state or voted Republican". You're saying that means I'm advocating for the tolerance of hate. I am not advocating for that. I'm saying that wishing harm on people is shitty. Of course we should ban bigoted speech from online spaces.
It's absolutely the same thing, you're just not paying attention to what you're actually saying.
I think you live in a bubble.
The modern version of "no u"? Rapier like, truly.
Intolerance towards the intolerant. That is absolutely what the paradox of tolerance implies.