this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
748 points (98.8% liked)

memes

16825 readers
4203 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Assigning a value of 5 to pi, although ludicrous IRL, doesn't affect the problem. Plug the values into the equation and it will still give an answer that's correct in context.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wish they would have used 22/7 for pi and 7 for the radius or height

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For the benefit of doubt, maybe the test is from an alternate dimension that doesn't use euclidean space.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been there, I think, but it was really difficult to triangulate my location and confirm

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago

That's because you were supposed to rhombusulate, not triangulate.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Possible. I mean, electricity could actually be run by ghosts, but there's no need for fanciful explanations when a mundane one is right there.

[–] bss03 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Do cylinders even exist in metrics where pi = 5 ?

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. The 3d shape existence is not affected by changing pi values

[–] bss03 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cause it's just a (n-1)-dimensional ball extruded along the remaining axis, or do all 3d shapes exist on (nearly) all 3d metrics?

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Mostly because the actual pi values can vary in between non/euclidean geometries. Within extremely strong gravitational fields, spacetime becomes highly non euclidean, affecting the C/d ratio of an actual circle, so I'd wager this would affect pi as well

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically no, because pi equals pi not 5. But you can approximate its value as 3 or 5 or whatever you want, knowing it's not exact and that your result will only be an approximation. I mean you could also ask how long light takes to reach us from Alpha Centauri if the speed of light is 1000 mph. It's not, but if you make that a condition of the problem you can do the calculation just fine.

[–] bss03 2 points 2 months ago

I think that reason would make it "Technically Yes", since False (pi = 5) implies False (cylinders exist) is (vacuously) True ("absurd premise").

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the goal is to avoid calculations with decimal places, why not just leave Pi in the result?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That would work too.