this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1263 points (97.5% liked)

News

35749 readers
2735 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 91 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If you think the porn industry is exploitative and abusive now, just wait until they push it all underground.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Woah, that's a thought that hadn't occurred to me. You're absolutely right.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is true about almost every vice. That's why Prohibition didn't work. Almost as soon as alcohol was banned, people started making very adulterated products, people died, organized crime became a thing. It's the same idea with cannabis, sex work, other drugs, etc. The result of prohibition is almost always people getting hurt.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

This is exactly it. A couple of days ago there was an Ask Lemmy thread about the legalization of marijuana. My entire argument is "Prohibition of vice does not work and only empowers organized crime." This has been proven over and over again throughout history. It shouldn't even be a question anymore.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s more complicated than that. It /did/ work in some sense. The prevalence of severe alcoholism was insane prior to prohibition and it dropped precipitously. The problem is, the cost of prohibition is so many actual lost lives. Both from unsafe supply and organized crime.

A public health approach also can reduce the harm of alcoholism while not creating new deaths. It’s worth understanding the difference so we can expect, for example, pot to become more abused after legalization, but if public health measures are in place, limited harm.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Nothing that you said contradicted anything that I said. We are agreeing.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I’m pretty anti-porn just like I’m very anti-religion but neither of these things can be killed by banning them. The idea that banning porn will somehow prevent people from accessing it when we know even people in NK or places like the Middle East can access it is just crazy, of course Americans will continue to be able to access it, and like you said this will just push production and distribution underground actually exacerbating the issues with the porn industry. I have few actual complaints about the end result of porn, I don’t believe it’s good or healthy but as a product to be consumed it’s only moderately harmful but the production of porn is where the real evils are found. This will lead to those in the porn industry being abused at rates and in ways currently unfathomable or illegal.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

Just think about the popularity of the "schoolgirl/barely legal" image as it currently exists in porn. If it becomes just as illegal to hire a young-looking 25 year old actress as it is to exploit an actual child, a lot producers will opt for the latter.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The studios will move out of the country, most likely.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Some will. But like with alcohol prohibition, many of the people who work in the industry will just go to work in the black market.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I suspect the OnlyFans crowd may do that.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most definitely. And since their entire job is illegal, why not go all-in and do more illegal stuff on cam for higher pay? That would be my thought process.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Given how little the vast majority of creators make on that platform, I suspect most of them will just quit.

There will definitely be a few that keep going though, I wonder what the penalty will be? And how much enforcement will there be?