this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1263 points (97.5% liked)

News

35749 readers
3272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 107 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's part of the plan in Project 2025, to ban pornography and then classify LGBT literature as pornography

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The plan is to classify trans people as being pornographic by their very existence.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I read somewhere that Texas is trying (as in someone in the legislature) to make transgender people legally non-existent. Apparently the same shit I read is being attempted in the UK.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Logically, that means they wont have to pay taxes and can't be charged with murder. But we know the law wouldn't be applied logically.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That wasn’t what I read. The specific words were “legally non-existent” as in they don’t exist. It could be gender fraud is what was implied but not how it was explained.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

ah, yes - that one basically doesn't allow the state to recognize anything but assigned sex at birth (or some other reality-denying fabricated definition of "biological sex"), thereby eliminating trans identity - this is a form of genocide, called social death. Other states already have passed laws like this:

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/defining-sex-states-are-denying-transgender-people-legal-recognition-rcna140694

Looks like the bill passed the house in TX (waiting to see what the Senate votes):

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/10/texas-house-trans-bills-advance/

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yikes! I didn’t realize it would be considered genocide.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

it's still debated whether the anti-trans movement in the US has genocide as a goal, but I think it's a fair characterization since the movement has explicitly stated their goal is "the eradication of [trans people] from public life":

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/cpac-speaker-transgender-people-eradicated-1234690924/

since the goal is total elimination, it makes it a candidate for genocide more than other kinds of oppression, e.g. the enslavement and oppression of Africans in the US (another case some have argued as being a genocide).

the Lemkin Institute is one of the organizations arguing the anti-trans movement is genocidal:

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/red-flag-alerts/red-flag-alert-for-the-anti-trans-agenda-of-the-trump-administration-in-the-united-states

either way, methods like legally removing a concept of a group is a method of genocide used in the past, which is why I bring it up.

in particular it's an example of social death:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_death

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 21 points 9 months ago