258
Son of CIA deputy director was killed while fighting for Russia, report says
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
258 points (99.2% liked)
News
35749 readers
2280 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sorry, I think I actually jumped to my own conclusions and misunderstood your comment. I wrote a really long comment but it looks like it got lost somehow. This is the shortened version:
You make a really good point about what empathy truly is, and something I've been thinking about a lot lately.
We have these people in power that want to claim empathy is a weakness because they try to misconstrue what empathy actually is.
Empathy does not mean you must take pity on someone or agree with them on every issue. It's actually a very useful tool and strength because it allows you to gain insight into their decision making process.
A lack of empathy can definitely lead people to do some horrible shit to each other bc they view the other person as less than human, but the lack of empathy can actually be exploited as a weakness.
Encouraging people to lack empathy is actually just encouraging a weakness in order to deceive and manipulate.
Like you're saying about this kid, looking at it from his perspective it's not so hard to see how he could be deceived, but it still does make me wonder if: A. He was targeted for propaganda because of who he was, and B. If targeting people to create the general idea of a "tankie" or any other extremist identity actually kind of leaves us all vulnerable by encouraging us to lack empathy for that individual?
No problem. To add on being able to identify the way others view matters and the rational they employed to justify their actions allows us to identify logical reasons from their perspective for them to change their opinions.
On point A, I suspect he self-radicalized at first and then entered his own bubble where he further leaned more into radicalization.
On point B, I believe it does. It doesn't matter what the negative label is; viewing individuals as the caricatures that float in our minds when we hear words like "tankie" or other words that serve only, for us, to brand individuals as part of a incorrect collective encourages us to make these same un-empathic mistakes.
We shouldn't like many of these people we brand as things like "Tankie"; but we should understand why they feel the ways they do.