this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
520 points (78.0% liked)

Comic Strips

18843 readers
1111 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
520
Safe professions (infosec.pub)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by lawrence@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

Thanks to @deeply_moving_queef@lemmy.ml for finding the original author:

https://www.instagram.com/linhadotrem/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 238 points 4 months ago (29 children)

Automation and job replacement is a good thing. The reason it feels bad is because we've tied the ability to satisfy our basic needs to employment. In an economic model that actually isn't a dystopian hellscape, robots replacing jobs is something to celebrate.

And to switch our economic model to one in which a person can thrive without pissing the vast majority of our lives away on the grind; we just need to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps!

[–] sxan@midwest.social 94 points 4 months ago (27 children)

This is so important.

An aspect of post scarcity is that people shouldn't have to work. AGI might allow that; LLM is starting to fill some niches.

The problem is how it's being done. Rather than benefiting society as a whole, it's enriching a few. In an ideal world, people whose jobs are replaced should get a stipend. We should all be eagerly awaiting that time when our jobs are replaced and we get a paycheck - maybe a little reduced - but now we're free to pursue our interests. If that means doing your old job, only now it's bespoke, artisan work, great.

The other missing factors are free energy and limitless resources; but we're making progress on energy, but resources are an issue with no solution on the horizon. Plus, we're killing the planet by just existing, so there's that.

We have a lot of problems to solve but AI is part of the solution, except that it's being done wrong. And expensively.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We have a lot of problems to solve but AI is part of the solution, except that it's being done wrong. And expensively.

There's also a conversation to be had about which jobs shouldn't be automated, either because current technology isn't suitable, or because it might never be suitable. And I'd say that pretty much everything that we are calling 'AI' right now falls under that - I'll say that robots are part of the solution, but I don't think 'AI' is.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

Even if AI is, what we have now is mostly A with only the semblance of I. "Real" "AI" is not yet "real."

[–] sxan@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

I agree. LLMs are not AGI. But there are some jobs they can do, and a lot of jobs they can assist.

But I think we're still another generation of apparent AI stagnation, maybe another 20-30 years, before someone figures out there next link; and that might be AGI.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)