this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
225 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

12864 readers
726 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 54 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I really don’t get why people like to buy such huge gas guzzlers and somehow those are the people I hear complain about gas prices the most

We should really just have EU law that over a certain size requires a new license that isn’t automatically given to people that have one now.

[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I reckon doing what Norway does and just tax them by the weight of the vehicle to to discourage people buying them while alps making those that do pay for the extra wear and tear in the roads they cause.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Sadly this does discourage EV growth which I do think still should continue instead of having fuel cars. I'd love if air quality would go up again.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This could be offset by tax rebates for the EV, or by taxing gasoline and diesel so much that you break even or still come out on top even with the weight tax.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Stop fossil fuel subsidies in terms of fuel for vehicles and use that budget to: subsidize EV adoption + charging instead.

https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/fossil-fuel-subsidies

Issue with this? The people who already don't have much money will have a very hard time as driving will be even more expensive for them and getting a new car already requires a good amount of spendable money (certainly when they'd have to sell their car to an exporter with less people wanting gas cars). I personally don't know how we'd tackle this issue.

I'm also for a usage based tax, after x Liters of fuel you pay more taxes (on a yearly basis) but don't think they could realistically do this

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

IMO the money would be better spent to subsidize electrified trasnit. In north america that money could also be used to support dense housing projects along that transit corridor, providing more ridership for the new transit and tackling the housing crisis. This is a better solution because electrified transit is even more energy and resource efficient than private electric vehicles and the transit is more accessible to everyone than private electric vehicles are

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah 100%

Here in the Netherlands our public transport is pretty well done, but the main issue is that the cost of tickets is unbearably high for our train system so having that cheaper would certainly increase ridership and decrease car dependency

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Its so hard hearing the term "car dependancy" come out from the netherlands while I'm stuck in North America. Theres definitely room for improvement still in the netherlands but at least the bones of the city are still intact. Its arguable harder to fix most of north america in its current state than starting fresh would have been.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

Oh yeah it isn't nearly as bad as the US but outside of big cities you're still dependent on your car

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The roads don't care about whether the car is ICE or EV. There are plenty of gigantic SUV's that are hybrids or even electric. Eventually we will see electric 18 wheelers.

There should be an additional tax on ICE's for their emissions as well to capture that higher externality. But remember EV's are not emission-free. Anything with tires is a source of pollution.

Personal vehicles cause a lot of problems for humanity, and only some of those are exclusive to ICE's.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Just stagger the classes not just by size and/or weight but also by motor type. For instance, a tax class for ultracompact cars could look like this:

  • Length ≤ 3400 mm
  • Width ≤ 1480 mm
  • Height ≤ 2000 mm
  • Curb weight ≤ 1000 kg (ICE), 1200 kg (hybrid, BEV)

(I basically went with Japan's current definition of kei cars and replaced the displacement restriction with a weight restriction.)

[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 7 points 4 months ago

If you tax them the same as gasoline, sure. In the Netherlands, there are so many huge EVs, and I think that's partially because all EVs, large or small, weren't taxed. We made a distinction between gasoline and diesel for tax, no reason we can't do that with EVs.

[–] YungOnions@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's not just ICE cars that are huge. Even new EVs tend to be unnecessarily large SUVs or Sedans.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Very much, I drove an ID.4 as a company car for 6 months and it was such a horrible experience. Huge and just to move 1 55kg person c'mon man.

Also drove a Tesla M3 after that and was already much better, low on the floor and felt much safer and good to drive. Would love to have an electric version of my Toyota Yaris (hybrid), its a great size for me.

Oh even better? Cheaper public transport so I don't have to take the car to save money!!

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Its green and eco-friendly so i can waste as much of that extra energy as i want seems to be the attitude people have. We've made emissions be the spotlight of our energy crisis when the total amount of energy we use is still important, potentially even more important than just reducing emissions alone.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

This really annoys me too.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I really don’t get why people like to buy such huge gas guzzlers

As a dumbass American who's been considering that for forty years, let me try to help: The short answer is, very tiny pee-pees.

I wish I had a better answer, but that's honestly the majority reason. They do bang on about "safety" a lot, but when that's scientifically proven to be false they still say it so - back to item number 1.

Over here, the enormous gas-guzzlers eventually weren't enough so they had to super-size even them. Now we have these gargantuan death behemoths everywhere for absolutely no reason (well, for one reason).

[–] gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good luck, given all the car lobbying going on here...

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

Its so sad, here in the Netherlands if public transport was just cheaper it'd already be able to replace almost all my commuting. But I pay less for my car driving somewhere AND back than a 1 way train ticket.