this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
939 points (99.4% liked)

History Memes

3223 readers
967 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 234 points 4 months ago (24 children)

Props to the movies that shout the "Loose!" command

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 81 points 4 months ago (22 children)

As I understand it, that's still not very historically accurate. It was not really a thing for archers to nock and loose together like they do in the movies.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volley_fire Y'all really just make stuff up without even checking wikipedia huh? It wasn't typically used in medieval Europe for bows beyond the initial volley, though of course initial volleys were still a thing. You didn't just have elements of archer formations fire whenever they decided the range seemed right.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

I made this comment in passing and prefaced with "as I understand it." Always happy to be corrected.

[–] antbricks@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

I followed the cited source for the wikipedia claim, and it's just a guy writing a paper and saying his opinion. He's not citing anything deeper to cover his claim about an initial volley followed by targetting individual solders. Just because it's in a paper doesn't mean it's right, or even well-researched.

Sure, it FEELS right, and that does have weight with living history and experimental archeology, but I worry that "feeling" is the only thing anyone is actually citing in this whole conversation, including Wikipedia.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)