this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
939 points (99.4% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3468 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but each archer will only be able to have so many arrows. What good is an archer if he only had 20 arrows and fired them all, already? If command thinks they'll need archer support for more strategic things, they may not want them firing off as many as they can quickly, even if the archer believes each arrow will hit its mark.

[โ€“] j_overgrens@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

Armies relying on archers often had a continuous resupply running towards archers in position.