this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
743 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

30720 readers
2854 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 126 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It would be nice if it was possible to describe perfectly what a program is supposed to do.

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a... code

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?

[–] Natanael 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?

[–] maiskanzler@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What, like some kind of design requirements?

Heresy!

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Design requirements are too ambiguous.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

That's why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I'm a systems analyst, or in agile terminology "a designer" as I'm responsible for "design artifacts"

Our designs are usually unambiguous

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think our man meant in terms of real-world situations

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And NOT yet another front page written in ReactJS.

Oh, well, that's good, because I have a ton of people who work with Angular and not React.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This still isn't specific enough to specify exactly what the computer will do. There are an infinite number of python programs that could print Hello World in the terminal.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I knew it, i should've asked for assembly

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but that's a lot of writing. Much less effort to get the plagiarism machine to write it instead.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ha

None of us would have jobs

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

I think the joke is that that is literally what coding, is.