People Twitter

7850 readers

1742 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1295

That seems pretty far-fetched... (infosec.pub)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gil2455526@lemmy.eco.br 16 points 4 months ago (7 children)

To make it more sci-fi: We have only found such thing in one planet in the whole galaxy, maybe universe.

[–] slaveOne@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago (6 children)

That's not saying much, since we have only observed roughly 0.0000001% of our galaxy's planets. For all we know there are more planets with trees than without.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it wouldn't have been surprising if you said universe, bur in our Galaxy?! That's crazy, when does a planet count as observed?

[–] slaveOne@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Since we are talking about trees, I would say when we are able to tell if a planet has trees or not.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Lol, fair enough. I got zero clue how we'd find that out efficiently.

load more comments (3 replies)