Programmer Humor

25671 readers

2409 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

221

Code analyzer lore (infosec.pub)

submitted 4 months ago by carrylex@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This post was brought to you by this PMD rule.

Transcription

Why do we have this stupid code analyzer rule enabled anyway? Nobody writes code like this...

After telling them the lore why it's there:

You have seen such things before?

11 Times, as a matter of fact

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So I don't java (or ms java either) anymore. Why can't you just reference the class itself?

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the 2nd does that already

in the first you can't, as getClass() is not a static method (wouldn't even make sense if it was)

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

The GP is saying that String is a class already, you shouldn't have to call String.class.

Personally, I'm away from it for long enough that I don't remember either.