News

36965 readers

1820 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

103

US Supreme Court to scrutinize Federal Communications Commission fund's legality (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case challenging the legality of the FCC’s Universal Service Fund, which raises $9 billion annually to expand phone and internet access.

The 5th Circuit Court previously ruled the fund unconstitutional.

It held that Congress improperly delegated legislative power to the FCC and that the FCC unlawfully transferred authority to a private company, the Universal Service Administrative Company.

The FCC defends the fund as lawful, citing congressional authorization. A decision is expected by June, amid heightened scrutiny of federal agency powers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who's to say the purpose of "Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment" is to connect houses.? Or, to put it another way, NASA has received billions of dollars and also hasn't connected any houses. It's easy to understand why: NASA doesn't do that.

Who is to say that BEAD is trying to make last mile connections? If they're not them your entire premise is wrong. It'd be like complaining that NASA has spent hundreds of billions of dollars and still hasn't launch a single commercial passenger.

I live in a rural area and we're seeing a pretty rapid expansion of broadband connections. We had DSL and cable in some places but now there are large fiber deployments to new neighborhoods and the DSL and cable areas are having fiber service made available over time.

Just using caps lock and BILLION doesn't make a good argument. Nor does pretending that broadband expansion isn't happening or creating arbitrary inapplicable standards for programs ("NASA hasn't flown commercial passengers: WORTHLESS").

As a taxpayer I would like to know WTF the USAC is doing

You should have just stopped there and started learning what USAC is and what it spends its money on; instead of screaming that the sky is falling because you personally don't understand a federal program.