LinkedinLunatics

5261 readers

164 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

csm10495@sh.itjust.works

crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz

251

Liking any of these indicates a belief system I don't agree with (infosec.pub)

submitted 4 months ago by slazer2au@lemmy.world to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/24303260

URL: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/michelesollecito_in-my-own-company-i-wouldnt-hire-anyone-activity-7309491565603835904-uBhX

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

No mutable types? So like.. no lists? no for ... i++?

I get that there are alternative approaches, but I don't quite see why you'd want to go to that extreme with this idea? It's useful for some applications but even for a simple video game it's likely not helpful.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

Pure functional programming is often like this.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Erlang/Elixir doesn't have muteable variables/types. Appending to a list would just create a "new" lists.