this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
605 points (98.1% liked)

memes

16638 readers
2318 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

While technically true, it feels kinda blamey and thought-terminating. I prefer to view addiction as a medical condition because it puts the focus on treatment and prevention rather than who did wrong.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do agree with that, but you can't say there wasn't awareness on his side.

While I follow some of your argument I cannot entirely absolve the self in matters of addiction. It is a medical condition, but I wouldn't call alcoholics who drive under the influence and kill a person not responsible for their actions., therefore drowning in a drug induced stupor has a function of responsibility in it.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do see where you're coming from!

At some point, I radically rejected the concept of blame for extreme cases — all the way from drunk driving to murder. I think it's necessary to prevent these people who are acting irrationally from hurting others, but it just feels like a waste of my emotional energy to assign blame to someone who's behaving in a way I can't comprehend.

For context, someone in my family was killed when I was a kid. I still feel anger at the perpetrator, but I can't even pretend to understand what would go through their head to make them act the way they did. My conclusion was just that they're basically an alien to me — a broken person who can't be trusted and has to be locked up. But did they commit a sin?

After writing this, I realize it's the same sentiment as "Larry Ellison is a lawnmower."

Do not fall into the trap of anthropomorphizing Larry Ellison. You need to think of Larry Ellison the way you think of a lawnmower. You don’t anthropomorphize your lawnmower, the lawnmower just mows the lawn - you stick your hand in there and it’ll chop it off, the end. You don’t think "oh, the lawnmower hates me" – lawnmower doesn’t give a shit about you, lawnmower can’t hate you. Don’t anthropomorphize the lawnmower. Don’t fall into that trap about Oracle.

https://simonwillison.net/2024/Sep/17/bryan-cantrill/

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

I can see how that makes coping easier. And follow your agreement for a bit.

The grasmower argument doesn't gel with me, though. I can't release human agency that easily. I mean one doesn't have to anthropomorphize a human being, as they are -well- a human being.

But on the ethical side of this much debate is possible. It hangs on the free will/ determination side of debate, not really one end all answer.