After about thirteen years I decided to give this a reread and realized I did forget a lot of it. It took longer to read due to the parallels between the state of the world and it's themes. I kept having to put it down for a few days. Most of the book is a simple read with only the last third becoming emotionally more difficult.

It's a disheartening book but I think it's something people should read regardless, at least once.

Thanks for reading!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fujiwood@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Dang, I do have a copy but I don't know if I want to go back to back dystopian or just rip off the bandaid to get through it.

I also have Fahrenheit 451, which I really do like, but I haven't read that one in over a decade as well. I'm thinking I should just go ahead and reread them. Thanks for the motivation!

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I used to find BNW an easier read because it's not presented as a soul crushing authoritarian like 1984, but revisiting it gets heavier and worse each time.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. - Neil Postman

[–] fujiwood@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance

watches the news

"Well."

Now I actually do want to read it.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves To Death is where that quote is from. It's not a fiction book, more an analysis of how the entertainment industry has changed public discourse in 1985, but I still found it an interesting (and concerning) read.

load more comments (1 replies)