this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
665 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

73602 readers
3627 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Can anyone knowledgeable tell us if this is feasible, practical, or a good idea?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 71 points 4 months ago

Yes, yes and yes, but it'll take a while. It's a six year project overall.

[–] cocolowlander@feddit.nl 63 points 4 months ago

Feasible, yes. Practical, hard to say. Good idea, yes.

RISC-V is open-source architecture based in Switzerland (although it started in University of California).

One thing going for it is China is spending billions a year towards RISC-V adoption so they do not get sanctioned by the US. You need money and engineers working on it towards these type of open source to compete with existing players.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not knowledgeable enough to answer, but I know China's also going big on RISC-V.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 67 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The great thing about RISC-V if you care about sovereignty in an age where CPUs run the world is that it's an open standard. Contrast this with x86 which is owned in some part by US-based Intel and some part by US-based AMD as well as ARM which is owned by Japanese-owned, UK-based Arm Holdings. If you want to use x86, you're shelling out license money to Intel and AMD, and if you want to use ARM, you're shelling out license money to Arm Holdings. You never truly "own" what you're producing.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This is the way

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 months ago

With tariffs and sanctions, it has become clear that open standards which can’t be controlled by governments are what is needed.

With what’s been happening over the past few years, there will be a lot of interested in this. Recently, I’ve seen lots of news about it, but that could just be the algorithm.