politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It's been done hundreds of times from different groups all over the fucking world. There is no correlation. This is a waste of time and money when these people have more important fucking things to be handling.
But that money is being wasted to make sure they find the correlation this time for suresies, guys, we're definitely going to prove the whole rest of the world wrong this time wif our big smawt amewican bwainses
And all the other health organizations will still have the same data and disprove it immediately. You can just outright say whatever the fuck you want publicly and it's the same effect. This won't stop vaccines. It won't stop people from getting vaccines. It won't stop doctors from recommending vaccines. It'll only make people look fucking stupid and useless.
I'm aware, but they cant fudge the numbers or fake studies because THE DATA IS PUBLIC. Coming out with a bullshit finding is still easily disproven because everyone else can still see your data. Then you just look like a bigger fucking idiot.
It's like trying to fake a slip and fall in a casino when you have hundreds of cameras watching you from all angles.
You're missing the part about public data. The CDC is legally required to post any data from studies conducted. This is because guidance of these studies is to be considered by medical institutions and professionals. It's not a board of opinion that just randomly issues guidance with no scientific data to back it up.
Using your example of the sharpie incident: he was mercilessly made fun of and laughed at, and numerous organizations came out and told him what a fucking idiot he was, and nobody listened to a thing he had to say regarding the context of the storm.
Take that into account with this study:
All these doom and gloom points of view are just not in the realm of reason and are completely ignorant of the fact that the rest of the world still exists and reviews this data as well.
Everyone knows these people are idiots and mentally ill. The CDC is a scientific institution, yes, but does everyone need to abide by everything they say? Fuck no.
If they issue a falsified study, it will be immediately disproven. Publicly. They aren't a law-making agency by any means, so can they force medical institutions to abide by their studies? Fuck no.
They'll be laughed at by the rest of the world, and the dumbest amongst us will die of preventable diseases while trying to sidestep autism and find out it still exists anyway, while the more intelligent of us get vaccines and live on.
If that's these assholes want to take that road, then I welcome it. Fuck em.
I mean, in general I agree, but the people directing this aren't exactly the rule-following type. Nor do they care about facts, truth, or integrity. Anything published will fit the narrative. Anything that doesn't fit the narrative will be blackholed.
To what effect though? That's my point. You're just yelling into the void of mental illness by publishing fake data. Nobody is going to listen when other, better, competing data is not falsified.
The CDC doesn't control anything. They just publish data. They can't ban vaccines, nor can Congress, and there is no legislation that can prevent people from getting them, so whatever the darkest possible outcome is won't do anything.
Reread everything you just said, realize what the CDC is, then read my comments again.