this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
8 points (78.6% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1464 readers
1 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've never specifically mentioned aliens and have been very clear about my openness to all possibilities. These could include man-made phenomena, non-human intelligence, psychological operations, or simply nothing at all.
If you find Commander Fravor's testimony and the supporting witness accounts to be credible, what would you presume the Tic-Tac object to be?
Doesn't necessarily mean it, no. But it doesn't exclude it either. If you have any evidence that would convince me it's definitively not extra-terrestrial I will dismiss the possibility from now on.
That's not doing a good job of convincing me of your point of view. I'd go one step further and say that presenting arguments against little green men like false generalizations, intellectual belittling, social acceptance and logical fallacies...
Well, makes it seem there's no good arguments against it at all.
I invite you to work towards making this a neutral (or even positive) environment to discuss a very divisive topic and challenge you to inquire more about both the general consensus on the topic and the vastly different viewpoints within the field.