this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
68 points (98.6% liked)
World News
496 readers
477 users here now
Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590
Other Great Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
On the surface capping vulturous financiers to better support teachers, etc sounds like a good thing? Someone explain why this isn’t a good thing.
At least read the except, if you're not reading the article? The lady is earning 800 USD monthly, and just lost a quarter of it. If anybody's vulturous it's not her.
Do note that it's not as bad as $800 sounds like to a US citizen: Shanghai is probably the most expensive city in China, and the cost of living there is $613 according to numbeo.com. But that's a pre-mortgage figure, and obviously a Western site may not be well up-pt-date with current realities.
my understanding is that you need 1k income to live decent in non tier 1 city, and in tier 1 city, you will need 2k to make worth it vis a vis QoL.
decently? definitely. a decent salary needs to be quite a bit above the cost of living
this comment and comment above are not logically congruent
My point was that it's bad, but not nearly as bad as someone earning $800 a month in the US. I did not articulate that well.
I'm not sure what exactly "public service workers" entails, but since the article mentions them being the foundation of government management, I suspect it to mean only the bureaucrats (known in China as "civil servants" 公务员, which literally translates to "public servicing personnel") got a raise.
This isn’t stopping those at the top getting rich off the industry, it’s stopping single mothers from paying their mortgage.
You are confusing a wage slave with the industry she works for.
That's like saying a janitor at bank is now part of the bank owner and operator class.
it's a good thing.