this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
179 points (95.0% liked)

196

5448 readers
915 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If just Elon Musk's wealth was equally redistributed in the US every citizen would be a millionaire.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

A few hundred billion divided by a few hundred million is on the order of a thousand, not a million. More specifically: 421 billion divided by 340 million is just over 1200 dollars.

Is doing simple maths impossible when the answer is something you don't like? I thought that was a conservative-only disease.

Be better, leftists!

Instead, say:

If we took Musk's money and use it to help the poor, we would solve world hunger within a decade and prevent 5 million children from dying of hunger each year.

The meme should be:

5 million children die each year and Musk is the richest man in the world

Vs

5 million children are well-fed instead of dying of hunger but Musk only has a few tens of billions left

Source: https://www.wfp.org/stories/we-have-resources-end-hunger-no-child-should-be-allowed-starve

Besides being correct, this has another advantage: it does not reinforce the idea that morals end at national borders.

@SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world could you please make this meme? Or someone else?

[–] amon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What if instead of dividing it equally, we split it upwards from the poorest up until the millionare line? Would there be enough then?

(I don't actually know can't be bothered to do the math)

[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I just edited my comment to include exactly that, thanks!

load more comments (2 replies)