In short:

Australia's peak climate body has published new modelling showing the Coalition's proposed nuclear pathway would result in an additional 2 billion tonnes of emissions in the atmosphere.

The analysis has sparked attacks from the Coalition on the credibility of Australia’s independent Climate Change Authority.

What's next?

The Climate Change Authority's chair Matt Kean said the current pathway of transitioning to renewable energy as quickly as possible was "the only viable option".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

For confused readers, the problem is "by 2050" not nuclear

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the proposal is to build seven new nuclear plants in a country with no existing nuclear industry. That's probably just realistically how long that would take, so nuclear is the problem.

It can't be deployed quickly, and it especially can't be deployed quickly by Australia. If it could, the coalition wouldn't be using it as an excuse to keep burning coal and gas.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 5 months ago

You think the coalition actually want nuclear? They want their best buddies in coal, oil and gas to profit as long as possible