this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
295 points (96.5% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4966 readers
169 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 76 points 6 months ago (8 children)

I believe that is 381 km squared, not 381 square kilometers. Vastly different areas. Germany is much larger than 381 square kilometers.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Oops. You are correct. Thank you. Fixing.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If it's a square 381km x 381km then that's 145161km² (and I'm not aware that there's any difference between "square kilometres" and "kilometres squared", is there?)

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Square x and x squared is the same thing. The proper way to say this is "A square of 381 km width"

[–] Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 months ago

It's very common to use km^2 (or m^2 or whatever) as a unit of area, with the understanding that a square with x km sides has area x^2 km^2. I can see what you're saying, but I think most people would call that area 'over 145 000 square km' or something, rather than talk about the side length.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)