Art & Design
🇬🇧 This is a bilingual community on a french instance.
Total subscribers:
🇬🇧 Let's discuss art and design!
Join us and
- 📰 share art news
- 💡 share art tips
- 🖼️ share your own art
- 💬 share your opinions
- 👁️ share your inspirations
This community is about art in all its form, as well as its influence on culture and its application at the service of society: architecture, music, literature, performances, video games, graphic design...
Check the pinned posts for basic rules and a (wip) list of art related communities 🔗
🇫🇷 Discutons d'art et de design !
Vous pouvez ici :
- 📰 Partager l'actualité
- 💡 Partager des astuces
- 🖼️ Partager vos créations
- 💬 Partager vos opinions
- 👁️ Partager ce qui vous inspire
Le sujet de la communauté concerne toutes les formes d'art, ainsi que leur influence sur la culture et leur application au service de la société : architecture, musique, littérature, performances, jeux vidéos, design graphique...
Pour toute question, suggestion, réclamation, etc. N'hésitez pas à utiliser le sujet épinglé.
✅ Les règles de l'instance s'appliquent bien évidemment.
view the rest of the comments
I agree there's a lot of design repetition throughout the AI logo ecosystem. It's almost as if the leadership of these companies did something asinine like use AI to generate a new logo, which would guarantee that they all look similar. But that would be stupid, right? And CEOs aren't stupid, lazy, and tight-fisted, right?
However, I'm not here to speculate about how useless CEOs are, or whether of you put a bunch of morons in a room together, they unsurprisingly make moronic decisions, or whether any executives reading this will huff and puff about how they aren't useless leeches making decisions about a business involving technology they don't understand. No, I'm here to quibble about terminology.
Hexagons are, indeed, the bestagons. However, few of these logos in this graphic are hexagons, and most don't even resemble hexagons.
Observations:
There is a fantastic amount of re-use of style in these.
The first logo is actually either 3 interlocking ovals, or two interlocked distorted triangles (with hidden bends); it's interesting, topologically.
Hexagons do recur, but the title:
is inaccurate as over half the logos contain no hexagonal elements. They all do tend to swirl, and most are symmetric. It's have been more accurate to say "the swirling circle", or "the celtic knot".
It's hard to believe that most of these weren't generated by AI; few are actually unique (#5) and share almost no element of another.
I learnt something (maybe I will forget it in the next hour, but nice read). Thanks