this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)

Meshtastic

1041 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss Meshtastic (https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm interested in this project, but I am unsure if there's anything actually useful or fun you can do with it.

So tell me about the fun stuff you've built!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's the idea yes.

But range depends on a lot of factors. In my context it's open fields and forests. The path from your cabin to your home, I expect to be more challenging.

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It will be challenging, for sure - it's in the woods, after all, and it's 150 km away. But that's exactly what LoRa is developed for, right? And if more people go online the problem of distance will disappear...

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lora in itself is just the radio communication, low level.

It doesn't do the meshing. That's meshtastics' thing. There's also lorawan that does it.

More info (1).

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How did you decide between LoRaWan and meshtastic?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Went with neither. We have our own gateways that connect to the internet.

LoRa itself travels kms if the terrain is favourable.

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Neat. But is there any architectural difference between the two? Do LoRaWan units also form a decentralised mesh network?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah they share little other than same radio carrier.

Lorawan is hierarchical, almost always eventually plug into the internet, data is binary, and upstream providers are usually commercial.

Meshtastic does its alternative network meshing thing.

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 2 points 6 months ago