this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
822 points (98.9% liked)

science

20981 readers
468 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
822
CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more) (insidemedicine.substack.com)
submitted 6 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.world
95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 214 points 6 months ago (6 children)

An attack on science is an attack on us all. They are trying to erase science they dont agree with. This is Christian fascism - welcome to giliad.

Anyone in the US please organise - join an anti religious influence group, protest, disobey. You must fight back.

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Science doesn't need politics, politics needs science.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 8 points 6 months ago

Science doesn't need politics to tell what is what, it's science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No it surely doesn't. Politics can exist with no new science.

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 6 points 6 months ago

It can, but it shouldn't.

load more comments (3 replies)