this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
1039 points (98.9% liked)

News

35749 readers
3272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 141 points 1 year ago (11 children)

The Trump administration says it put the tariffs in place to force China, Mexico and Canada to stop the spread and manufacturing of fentanyl, in addition to pressuring Canada and Mexico to limit any illegal immigration into the United States.

Can anyone else see any actual logic to this? Do the Trump Republicans really believe this, or are they just saying it? What do they really want to achieve, apart from Trump being able to see himself as a tough guy?

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 132 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's no logic to it at all. It's absolutely not about that.

Almost no fentanyl is getting into the US from Canada. A vanishingly small amount of illegal immigration occurs through the Canadian border.

It's just fascism and imperialism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

The majority of fentanyl being smuggled into America is being smuggled in by American citizens. It's not like cocaine or cannabis. You can smuggle a huge amount of fentanyl in a tiny bottle. Why risk sending it with an undocumented person?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

One would think there would be some talk about precursors... But nope just tax it 25 % that will be sure to get producers to stop. Pure idiocy

[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Saw a policy expert say it's a mixture of 3 things really:

  1. Trump likes to blame outsiders for problems and this is well received by his loyal base and gives off strongman vibes
  2. long term plan to switch from income tax (scales the more you earn) to consumption taxes (the poorer you are the more you pay for for consumption, relatively speaking) which benefits the rich at the expense of the poor. this wealth transfer is easier to sell when the populace is focused on outsiders
  3. Trump doesn't understand basic economics

source: https://youtu.be/2I1L1fXaYDs

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

They absolutely want to implement a national sales tax. They've been talking about it for a very long time and now they have the power to do it. And it's very much a "fuck the poor" policy.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tarrifs get paid to the Treasury, the Treasury is getting controlled by Musk and Trump, they can take whatever they want from those funds. Whos going to stop them? The Supreme Court takes bribes which can come from the same pot.

He just needs to keep a bit of support until all angles are secured. So he just spreads lies and blames everything on people here illegally to keep people pitted against each other. The largest source of illegals in this country is from overstaying Visas, the thing they are expanding to higher numbers.... Aka more people to keep blaming shit on while putting on a show of deporting the ones that are already here.

Honestly doesn't look like they'll need much time to accomplish it.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or they are just thinking of a quick cash grab ... gut the system and get as much wealth out of everything and everyone as fast and as much as possible ... let it all crash then abandon everything with all their money and let someone else fix everything.

[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I think in that scenario it's more likely that they would "buy the dip" then that they would up and leave. Some of the billionaires also want to found their own techno-fashist fiefdoms. This could be a good catalyst for that.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol on the switch from income tax. I haven't heard a peep about that since before the election. Everything is just going to cost more now and I'm still going to be paying income taxes.

[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

p 698 of project 2025 document:

The federal income tax system heavily taxes capital and corporate income and discourages work, savings, and investment. The public finance literature is clear that a consumption tax would minimize government’s distortion of private economic decisions and thus be the least economically harmful way to raise federal tax revenues.

more riches to capital and corporations, consumers will pay for it. it's all in there

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Won't someone think of the ultra wealthy?

I swear he wants to bring aristocracy to the US

[–] 4z01235@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I swear he wants to bring aristocracy to the US

He wants to further entrench the oligarchy, I think. And it seems to be working.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Did you hear his inauguration speech? Where he lamented the poor downtrodden billionaires who were now homeless because of the fires in LA?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have to say this in order to get around the provisions in the free trade agreement HE signed last time he was in office.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 16 points 1 year ago

Unfair... Trade deficits....

His words... About his own trade deal

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A. Enact sales tax on poor people so that they can fund further corporate tax cuts
B. Ruin relationships with the closest American allies as that is a net benefit for geopolitical rivals like Russia, who Trump is demonstrably in bed with
C. Market value collapse let's all the rich cronies that have crawled up Trump's asshole buy out what's left of America's assets at fire sale prices. 10 richest men doubled their wealth during covid. They want that to happen again.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How much lower can the taxes on them go? Warren Buffet already says he pays almost nothing.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Almost nothing" != "Nothing"

Besides, why stop at zero? Why shouldn't our benevolent job creators have a negative tax rate?

You owe them money!

[–] elfpie@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 year ago

You can always subsidize.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'mma let you in on a secret: Fentanyl basically is only a meaningful threat to addicts who don't know what they were taking. And if we actually cared about them, we would pump a fraction of a percent of our military budget into rehab and therapy to help them kick the habit and put narcan (sp?) in every emergency first aid kit right next to the defib. Beyond that, it is just an excuse for why a cop beat his wife or murdered a black kid.

As for what they ACTUALLY want to achieve? Saw an analyst hypothesize (on bluesky) that the real goal was the 10% tariffs. Put those on and drop them after vague claims of getting something in return (comparable to South America... fucking earlier this week?). It makes trump look "hard on China" while destabilizing relations between North America and later NATO. And it would result in basically every company jacking up their prices to pass that on to the consumer and then never lowering them because capitalism.

End result? increased profits for the oligarchs who jacked up their "made in America" products even more than the 10% they were now paying on materials and components.'

As for this? I don't like seeing my retirement funds go down the toilet (and am not optimistic they are ever coming back up this time) but fuckin' a. Burn it to the ground. It will hurt the little guy but it will hurt the 0.0000001%ers even more. The world is going to be on fire and have no water by the time I am eligible to take cash out of my 401k without penalties anyway.


That said? I assume he wants his base to believe the reason why groceries are still expensive is because Canada and Mexico just love fentanyl so much and they hate America. And his base will eat it up while the same useful idiots make sure the left is united against the Democrats (who do fucking suck but...).

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It feels like he's trying to accomplish the kind of hostile take over you see in business. That doesn't really work with a country though....

[–] Ellecram@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Businesses cannot effectively function when the government is clowning around like this.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Canada would have to go back to adding items to that one particular list they made for us.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 17 points 1 year ago

These tariffs are a way for Trump to tax his population so he can fund whatever he pleases. And the majority of his population don't even understand this 25pct tax is going from their pocket straight into his.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Trump is still butt hurt about world leaders, especially Justin Trudeau, laughing at him and making fun of him behind his back. The tarrifs are a way to generate funds to pay for tax breaks for the rich. It will also allow American companies to raise prices, and profits, without the cheaper Canadian products and with less supply so more demand. It's a bit of him being a bully, a bit of revenge, but mostly, like everything else he is doing, it's about allowing the wealthy to loot the country bankrupt while burning the thing to the ground and enriching himself.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump needs a fight, he cannot function without an enemy.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Did he just pick the only two other countries he could find on a map?

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's just a special operation to route out Nazis. It's 15 cases going down to 0. It'll be gone by Easter.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Getting a win even though it's for something that wasn't an issue in the first place.