No ‘scientific report’ that I can find. Unless I missed something, that means this doesn’t have a real source other than more hearsay…

You are absolutely correct. This alleged report is not in the public domain. Here is a timestamp where this report is discussed. It was allegedly provided to George Knapp to be submitted into the record at the hearing. I'll leave it up to you to ultimately form your judgments on this.

Also I don’t have a case to say that site is misinformation, but it doesn’t have any credibility either. Just another opinion site posturing as journalism.

Personally, based on what I've read, I don't consider it to be misinformation. What he has generally reported aligns with the accounts of others, such as Ross, Jeremy, George, and Michael Shellenberger, among others. He asserts that he has his own sources, and I believe he shares some sources with the aforementioned individuals.

There was an instance where he reported an alleged UAP sighting. The Black Vault was able to request more information in regards to this sighting through FOIA. This led to a judgement that the sighting was most likely flares. Chris appropriately corrected his report, showing the new evidence released through FOIA, indicating it was likely a military exercise involving flares.

With a topic that involves so much hearsay and minimal evidence in the public domain, all we can do is listen to individuals who have more access to information than we do and make our own judgement calls on whether we believe them or not. I understand that every individual will require different pieces of information to satisfy their definition of proof.