this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
712 points (97.2% liked)

Comic Strips

18628 readers
1657 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps, though I’d be very concerned for mob mentality. Social media is famously reactive.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No doubt. I think an easy way to counter that is to put a “deliberation” time on legislation. I’m spitballing but maybe require two votes 3 months apart, and they must both agree (otherwise there’s a third tiebreaker vote another 3 months later)? That would help kill off the flash fire effect that a viral meme can create and focus more on fixing problems that occur over a longer period of time.

I mean I’m no political scientist so I’d love to hear more about what methods are proven for direct democracy.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Making a second decision mandatory makes it harder to change existing laws. This can be a good thing in some cases, but not always. It increases conservatism (in that it's harder to change things).

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

No doubt. The goal is to make it harder for memes to affect the outcome of a decision.

Another way to approach it is if a supermajority votes for something, no secondary confirmation vote is required. Eg. reproductive choice would easily pass with one vote because it has such widespread support.