Your stance is perfectly reasonable and rational. When I post these articles, my aim is not to convince anyone of anything, especially without hard proof, but merely to share the current information that's available. The more eyes on something, the greater chance there is at finding evidence or holes in a given statement or argument. I'm hopeful that we'll start seeing some definitive evidence one way or the other sometime soon.

I'm also grateful for skeptics who participate here and help facilitate discussion. Personally, I don't feel any shame in being ignorant or wrong about a given subject. As long as I can adjust my stance given new information, I'm content. The truth is what matters to me in regards to this topic, and I believe that given enough time, the truth will always prevail.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the matter.

Just that I don’t care until I see something which consists of real evidence

I share a lot of your sentiment, yet I think it's worth having "recognized" these types of claims. If there's a situation later on that would support such claims, just the time marker on who knew what at what time tells a lot about connections.