this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
664 points (99.0% liked)

News

36993 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Around 75% of immigrant farm workers in Bakersfield, California, ditched their shifts after Trump ramped up his threats by removing protections against ICE raids in "sensitive areas," including schools and workplaces.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 100 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mmm, can't wait to pay $15 for produce. Fucking idiot Americans voting against their own interests.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't some morons vote for trump literally because of the egg prices?

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

Anyone I know who voted for trump for "economic reasons" are people I know to have the weakest grasp on what economic factors determine the price of eggs.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just spent $5 on a carton of eggs. Thanks Obama, for bird flu

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the real issue is we're using undocumented immigrants to do these jobs. They don't get the same protections that legal workers get.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That may be an underlying issue but when the baby is incessantly screaming and crying, it doesn’t help to throw boiling water on it

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, but we are well past people using logic and reason. We wouldn't be in this situation in the first place, and we could have spent time actually solving legal immigration (among many other things) instead of years of focus on her emails and all the nonsense of 2016-2020.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Start your "vistory" garden now.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Let me start to say that I'm on our side (probably), but are you implying that you want those workers to be underpaid and have no worker rights so your produce price stays low?

This has always been a complex dynamic.

For example, is it wrong for me to buy Tuna tinned in South East Asia? The people working there have few rights and are paid a pittance for their work. That said, it's a highly sought after job because the other jobs available in the area are far worse.

Really we're talking about labor arbitrage. Whether or not the labor actually happens locally or in a foreign jurisdiction, laborers residing in a poorer jurisdiction are selling their labor to people in a wealthier one.

I think the answer to whether or not it's "ok" is firstly a personal one, (maybe I'm ok with it while others aren't), but also dependent on the degree of difference.

It might be ok to buy tinned Tuna from a company that invests in foreign communities and pays employees a living wage with good terms, but probably not ok to buy tinned Tuna from a company that chains employees to machines for 16 hours a day before allowing them to return to their cage-box.

What I'm saying is, I'm ok with foreign workers being paid less provided that it's not exploitative, which is subjective.