Web Revival

823 readers

1 users here now

A movement focused on capturing the creativity and openness of the early Internet.

We aren't here to watch Big Web burn (we have plenty of communities for that) but to find positive ways we can make the Small Web better.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

founded 7 months ago

MODERATORS

emperor@lemm.ee

Emperor@feddit.uk

The Gemini protocol, a lighter alternative to the web's HTTP (geminiprotocol.net)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by silverchase@sh.itjust.works to c/webrevival@lemm.ee

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Gemini protocol is brutally simple, which makes it just about too useless for apps, tracking, and commercial purposes. Gemtext, the format for Gemini pages, is very basic; with about half as many features as markdown, it's barely a step above plain text. As a result, Gemini is a small universe of blogs and personal sites.

Its simplicity makes it easy for people to create compatible clients and services for it. It's self-hosting friendly and there are also hosting services, like smol.pub and some pubnixes.

Of course, you'll need to get a Gemini browser or visit a Gemini-to-web proxy to access it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (26 children)

You can just scrap the protocol and serve plaintext, or with just basic html tags like bold , links etc if you want to, works with any navigator.

What is the benefit of using a special navigator?

I'm asking because I think the idea kind of neat, and I'm working on something similar.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I’d love to see support for the protocol baked into the big browsers.

I really think we missed an opportunity to have an app:// protocol back in the ’00s instead of trying to kludge HTML into being software.

Browsers could totally do multiple protocols. I think ftp:// and gopher:// still works on most of them.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Used to -- I think both ftp:// and gopher:// have been removed by the big browsers (eg Chrome and Firefox).

Can't have competing standards that might let us avoid ads now, can we?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

B-but think of the golden parachute the Mozilla CEO can get!

load more comments (23 replies)