this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
170 points (97.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34164 readers
1747 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I keep seeing articles about the tech sector billionaires going mask off. I remember there being rumblings of a tech sector union. Also in the last 4 years there have been some ground gained for unions in the service sector too.

Wages are suppressed and with the looming tarrifs goods will be more expensive. Also anyone earning under 300k is going to see an increase in taxes with the proposed tax structure.

It seems around 30% of the population are really excited about Trump, 1% of that are funding efforts to support his platform. So what do the other 70% do? Do they strike?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Who's going to run out of food first?
The people with more money than God?
Or the people living paycheck to paycheck?

They would just wait it out until we had no choice but to go back to work, and we'd have to agree to far worse terms than we have now.

We'd be better off just dragging the rich out of their homes to preheated barbecue grills.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

A national general strike will bring corporations to their knees first. Of course they don't have to worry about food. Are you stupid? They have to worry about the fincial ruin it would bring.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Losing a week of profit, two max, isn't going to bankrupt a company, especially if they're not paying out anything for labor during that time. If it does, maybe they should cut back on the avocado toast.
The place I work for had to shut down for 11 days after an ice storm a few years ago and they paid us our full wages the entire time, didn't go under.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 13 points 7 months ago

A general strike isn't just about everyone going on strike, it's also about key sectors of the economy striking at the same time. If cargo airline workers, freight and trucking workers, and postal workers had a strike at the same time, national transportation logistics are suddenly looking pretty dicey aren't they?

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's not about bankrupting a single business. It's about the delays in service and opportunity cost. Shutting down supply lines. Loss of major investments. We are talking about shutting down an entire country.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Which is impossible with our current America unfortunately, those who do strike will likely won't see results for a week, and many won't strike even if they want to due to the wages

If these billionaires cared about money and they truly cared about it then they would have made programs to give wealth back and to have them use it on themselves to grow themselves

They want power, like right now where most go hungry some go homeless from striking only once, they got what they need.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't need you to tell me it's impossible. The only people you're serving right now are the billionaires. If you want to fall for the lie that they hold all the cards go ahead but I know it's the people who have real power.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Just-in-time supply chains mean that a day of lost work fucks things up for a week.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

If they can shut down the government we can shut down our jobs and industries, how panicked would they be after a month? Pretty sure a lot of us can do a month or two of canned soup and ramen.

There's a long history of strikes being very effective, less frequently in the US after 1947, but that doesn't mean it's not worth it or not going to be effective.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

When there is nothing left for the poor to eat, they will eat the rich.

[–] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

A similiar proportion of companies are in the same ‘paycheck to paycheck’ boat. There’s tons of zombie companies. It’s the big 7 that prop everything up