this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
151 points (96.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4283 readers
128 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They could still win (and lose) in three days. It all depends on who gets the first nuclear strike.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are enough warheads on both sides that no "first strike" could get all or even most. It's lose/lose any time.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Look, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed...

[–] NaibofTabr 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I just watched the British film 'Threads' about a nuclear exchange. Idk, how much nuclear winter will we need to counteract the global heating over the last 50 years?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It also depends on Russian nukes not being made of cardboard. Or Trump selling him the US arsenal.