this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)
Lemmy Apps
6644 readers
1 users here now
A home for discussion of Lemmy apps and tools for all platforms.
RULES:
- No spamming
- Be nice and have fun
- Follow the general lemmy.world rules
An extensive list of Lemmy apps is available here:
Visit our partner Communities!
Lemmy Plugins and Userscripts is a great place to enhance the Lemmy browsing experience. !plugins@sh.itjust.works
Lemmy Integrations is a community about all integrations with the lemmy API. Bots, Scripts, New Apps, etc. !lemmy_integrations@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Lemmy Bots and Tools is a place to discuss and show off bots, tools, front ends, etc. you’re making that relate to lemmy. !lemmy_dev@programming.dev
Lemmy App Development is a place for Lemmy builders to chat about building apps, clients, tools and bots for the Lemmy platform. !lemmydev@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not a "Lemmy App developer", but I am interested in having more fediverse apps that can rely on ActivityPub directly and less on the server-specific APIs, so I would propose something completely different:
Page
object.Yeah, I know that this route would be a lot more complicated than pushing for a quick feature. Still, it seems worth doing.
That's a valid point, but I've come to learn the Lemmy devs are only going to do what they want to do when they want to do it. With the exception of obvious bugs or security issues, I've just stopped reporting issues to them; not worth my time.
This RFC is just about how to present the information returned from the API (activity pub is not involved at this level) and trying to be consistent with other apps in how they do so.
Example being the spoiler tag. That's implemented in most clients as a custom markdown container - there's no ActivityPub model for that, only how the markdown text is rendered.
Further, if the activity pub collections is added, the rendering for the gallery wouldn't even need to be changed much, if at all. Essentially, I'm not trying to let perfect be the enemy of good.
I know, I agree, but I don't really blame them. Either we need to find a way to support them with more resources so that they can increase their output, or we need to take it upon ourselves to make the changes that we would like.
I know and it was clear from the beginning. I am just really tired of dealing with different clients and different accounts to participate in the Fediverse, and I really want to see more clients implementing the C2S side of ActivityPub...