this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
120 points (98.4% liked)

Seattle

1910 readers
9 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Concealed carriers commit violent crimes at 1/10th the rate of the general public. If you want to stop gun crimes, you would be more successful by prohibiting everyone except concealed carriers.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that the default state? Prohibited concealed carriers except those permitted?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying that if we are going to try to increase safety by banning people from public buildings and parks on the basis of whether they are carrying a gun, it would be statistically safer to ban non-carriers than carriers.

I'm not suggesting that we actually do this, of course.

[–] phughes@lemmy.ca -2 points 6 months ago

Agreed.

The people who apply for permits are the ones who'll obey the law.

I guess that means that permits are not an effective deterrent and that we should just ban guns altogether.

load more comments (12 replies)