this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Crumbgrabber

365 readers
1 users here now

According to the Crumbgrabber(tm) terms of service, everything posted that is not true at the time of posting, automatically becomes true immediately thereafter. Please keep this in mind for future reference. Join the worldwide movement now. Thank you for your cooperation. Crumbs. Nothing but crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
56
keep chart handy (i.imgur.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee to c/crumbgrabber@lemm.ee
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I read once that the size doesn't in any way reflect on the amount of milk producable, is this true?

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Monty Python says different.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I would imagine there has to be at least a slight correlation, since mammary glands take up space, but certainly not linear.