this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
694 points (98.6% liked)

News

35724 readers
2560 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Perhaps the most interesting part of the article:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There was a wildfire in the area last month. A couple years ago, a wildfire burned down a bunch of Malibu, a few miles away. I would be very surprised if wildfires in the area stop happening.

I think that maybe the most-reasonable solution is for insurers to just ramp rates way up unless a home is built to be extremely fire-resistant -- just assume that there are going to be wildfires that dump embers in the area sooner or later, and that if your home isn't constrained such that it is able to withstand being showered with embers without going up in flames, that it's going to be insanely costly to insure, because it's likely to burn sooner or later.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if one specific house is a concrete bunker, if it's in the middle of normal homes, the bunker still faces potentially 1000 degree temperatures from surrounding homes, and shit's going to burn.

You could pave everything; put in some 100-yard paved firebreaks; who know what else. Or you could just accept that there's going to be a lot of climate refugees fleeing high risk US states. All the heads-in-sand people thinking it was just Tuvalu and Kiribati at risk going to wake up and find out it's LA and Miami, too.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

and shit's going to burn.

Having a house next door burn doesn't entail that your house burns. You can see video from this fire of people walking around next to houses on fire -- they aren't spontaneously combusting. Heck, I had a relative who had exactly the not-burn thing happen to them in this fire -- the house next door burned down, but theirs didn't. And it's not hard to see that that has to be the case, or once one house in a city burns, the whole rest of the city would too. That didn't happen even in this fire, or there wouldn't be a Los Angeles left.

You can constrain how your house is built. You can have one of those counter-wildfire systems that has large tanks of water kept on-site and a generator-driven system that sprays it out over the property in a fire. I'm sure that there are others. They aren't necessarily cheap and some aren't pretty, but you can do buildings that can pull though fires.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, one house on fire next to you is probably fine, although I've seen that melt the siding off neighbors. All the houses on your block, especially when those houses are only separated by 6 feet, is a completely different situation.

[–] TomSelleck@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that it just makes more financial sense to just not insure the area. The property itself is wildly expensive and then the owners are sure to lawyer up if they don’t get exactly what they want. Makes more sense to just not issue policies.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The problem is that it just makes more financial sense to just not insure the area.

There is always going to be some price at which it makes sense for an insurer to insure a property, as long as they are not restricted in what price they can charge.

[–] Jarvis2323@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

They are restricted. California has an insurance commissioner who has to approve any rate increases. It’s probably easier to stop insuring then to get the rates up to the profitability margin their risk models are suggesting are appropriate.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Insurance companies wanted to raise rates... The insurance commissioner said no. So a lot are leaving.

Same for cars, getting a lot harder to find car insurance in Cali was well.