this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
738 points (99.9% liked)

TechTakes

2284 readers
39 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

so when was youtube profitable?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Youtube wasn't burning billions per year and it's also pretty much the primary entity for video for the whole world which has other benefits for google. Finally Youtube can be monetized through adverts, since storage and bandwidth costs are relatively low. Whereas GenAI's compute costs aren't.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can't they put ads into the responses?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

If they could, they would have already.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago
[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

An ad before and after every single question you ask chatgpt? Worth a shot, I guess !

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

I don't think Youtube was ever profitable, to be honest.