this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

> !metabolic_health@dubvee.org

125 readers
1 users here now

Moved to !metabolic_health@dubvee.org

A place to discuss metabolic health research, papers, talks, etc.

This topic can touch upon many people's personal triggers, so please be civil.

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you

The banner poster in high resolution can be found here

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
totallynotjet@lemm.ee
jet@hackertalks.com
jetlag@dubvee.org
inkjet@piefed.social
5
Paper - Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease - 2010 (doi.org)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/metabolic_health@lemm.ee
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Conclusions: A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. More data are needed to elucidate whether CVD risks are likely to be influenced by the specific nutrients used to replace saturated fat.

General Paper Analysis - This is a meta-analysis of epidemiology. While the meta aspect gives great confidence in the results, we have to be mindful that epidemiology is the weakest of scientific data. A pyramid built on sand - as it were.

But as the paper itself says

such studies have caveats, including a reliance on nutritional assessment methods whose validity and reliability may vary (25), the assumption that diets remain similar over the long term (26) and variable adjustment for covariates by different investigators. Nonetheless, a summary evaluation of the epidemiologic evidence to date provides important information as to the basis for relating dietary saturated fat to CVD risk.

Full paper at the link. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.26.12.1178

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Y Axis is log plot of Relative Risk, closer to zero is less risk (top)

I love the footnote on figure 3:

This indicates publication bias favoring studies with significant results.

.