this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
301 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

2340 readers
680 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 92 points 7 months ago (4 children)

And remember, kids, even if it was the right guy why the fuck were they ok with killing a guy over a fucking weed-wacker? Also why do they need to raid someone’s home over a not even that expensive bit of gardening equipment? Like yea I’d like my shit back too but if I was in the states I’d call insurance about it and get a new one long before I essentially ask the cops to go kill some dude over it.

[–] jonne 51 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, something's not right. Usually you can't get cops to even take a report for 'minor' property crimes, and these guys just go busting doors with guns blazing?

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Right?????

Something doesn’t add up.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

If I had to guess, either someone on the force didn’t like this guy.

Either that, or someone really cozy with the cops was mad about their weedeater being stolen.

It’s crazy to me that one of my neighbors could be doing something shady and it gets me killed. As often as my packages get delivered at the wrong place, it’s scary to think about.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Turns out it belonged to a county official. Go figure.

David Westerfield. The Laurel County Judge Executive.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The weedeater belonged to a local judge. Cops will go above and beyond for their pals who take them at their word on the witness stand.

[–] jonne 3 points 7 months ago

I figured it would be something like that.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not that I disagree with most of your comment, but insurance claim wouldn’t be worth it for a weed whacker as the excess would be prohibitive.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

True enough, though I’d still rather not send a potential hit-squad over it. The chance of that is low but nowhere near low enough. Just glad to live in an at least passably civilized country where I don’t need to worry about that as bad.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but you're not a "local judge".