Hardware

4387 readers

298 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@lemmy.world
Laptops - !laptops@lemmy.world
Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world

Can 4G feature phones rise again, thanks to thin clients? (www.theregister.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/hardware@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Shen told The Register 4G feature phones have until recently used the QQVGA standard for their displays – meaning developers only had 160 x 120 pixels to work with. QVGA jumps to 320 x 240 resolution, which he believes makes accessing the web on a feature phone at least a little bit more appealing.

I cannot imagine browsing the web on 320x240, let alone 160x120.

While I could see this being used in specific uses cases (for children, people with legal restrictions) and in the entry level market in some developing countries, I don't think feature phones can "rise again".

I am sure the people who are buying these 4G feature phones will switch to a regular super budget smartphone as soon they are able to find the money for it.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Back when phones with 160x120 screens were common, you used websites that were designed for them and they worked pretty well. The sites were mostly text, which was a good thing because 2G was slow and data was expensive.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

SeNt WiTh TaPaTaLk

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ouch, wap sites...

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 3 points 10 months ago

Developed my first one in 2000. Developed my last one in 2000 as well.

[–] dotslashme 5 points 10 months ago

Low resolution is less of a problem if you want content only. If you can live with pages that have all visual elements taken away, then resolution is much less of an issue.